Kiraz, N. Et Al. 2010. Are Disk Diffusion and Etest Methods Reliable for Detecting Candida glabrata and Other Species' Susceptibility to Fluconazole and Voriconazole?. JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY , vol.22, no.4 , 280-282.

Kiraz, N., Oz, Y., & Dag, I., (2010). Are Disk Diffusion and Etest Methods Reliable for Detecting Candida glabrata and Other Species' Susceptibility to Fluconazole and Voriconazole?. JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY , vol.22, no.4, 280-282.

Kiraz, N., YASEMİN ÖZ, And I. Dag. "Are Disk Diffusion and Etest Methods Reliable for Detecting Candida glabrata and Other Species' Susceptibility to Fluconazole and Voriconazole?," JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY , vol.22, no.4, 280-282, 2010

Kiraz, N. Et Al. "Are Disk Diffusion and Etest Methods Reliable for Detecting Candida glabrata and Other Species' Susceptibility to Fluconazole and Voriconazole?." JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY , vol.22, no.4, pp.280-282, 2010

Kiraz, N. Oz, Y. And Dag, I. (2010) . "Are Disk Diffusion and Etest Methods Reliable for Detecting Candida glabrata and Other Species' Susceptibility to Fluconazole and Voriconazole?." JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY , vol.22, no.4, pp.280-282.

@article{article, author={N. Kiraz Et Al. }, title={Are Disk Diffusion and Etest Methods Reliable for Detecting Candida glabrata and Other Species' Susceptibility to Fluconazole and Voriconazole?}, journal={JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY}, year=2010, pages={280-282} }