EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF WHITE LIGHT ON FATIGUE IN GYNECOLOGIC CANCER


Creative Commons License

Özerdoğan N. (Executive), Özkaraman A., Öge T.

Project Supported by Higher Education Institutions, 2018 - 2020

  • Project Type: Project Supported by Higher Education Institutions
  • Begin Date: July 2018
  • End Date: February 2020

Project Abstract

Aim: Cancer-related fatigue; relational, physical, emotional and / or cognitive fatigue or burnout associated with cancer and cancer treatment. In gynecologic cancers, fatigue can be seen before, during treatment or after cancer treatment. It is known that light application, which is among the circadian therapies, reduces fatigue. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of white light on fatigue in gynecologic cancer patients.

Method: The study was conducted with a randomized controlled experimental study. The patients who met the inclusion criteria and accepted to participate in the study were included in the experimental and control groups by permutation block randomization method and stratified according to their fatigue levels. In the nine-day data collection process for each patient, those in the experimental group received standard 10,000 lux white light for seven days, and the control group received routine maintenance. Data were collected by using the “Individual identification form ğu which includes information about the socio-demographic characteristics, disease and treatment of the patients and the Brief Fatigue Inventory to determine the fatigue level.

Results: A total of 42 women, 26 (experimental group) and 16 (control group) were included in the study. The mean age was 58,69 ± 13,39 in the experimental group; control group was 55.87 ± 13.97. Considering fatigue scores of patients according to their application and control groups; There was no statistically significant difference between the groups according to the first and second evaluation times. [(1.Valuation = Application group 4.92 ± 2.63; Control group 4.93 ± 2.14); (2nd evaluation = Application group 4.23 ± 2.50; control group 4.37 ± 2.52), (p> 0.05)].  There was no statistically significant difference in fatigue scores between the groups according to both evaluation times (1. Evaluation p = 0.985; 2nd evaluation p = 0.858).

Conclusion: Although the data collection process of the study is continuing, it is determined that white light treatment has no effect on fatigue in patients with gynecological cancer.