Comparison of Methods Used for the Diagnosis of Epstein-Barr Virus Infections in Children


Creative Commons License

KAŞİFOĞLU N., Oz S., DİNLEYİCİ E. Ç., US T., BÖR Ö., DURMAZ G., ...Daha Fazla

POLISH JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, cilt.67, sa.1, ss.81-88, 2018 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 67 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2018
  • Doi Numarası: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.6287
  • Dergi Adı: POLISH JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.81-88
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: ELISA, Epstein-Barr virus, immunoblotting, Indirect Fluorescence Assay (IFA), Real-time PCR, SOLID-ORGAN TRANSPLANT, MONONUCLEOSIS, IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE, ASSAY, AGREEMENT, LYMPHOMA, IGG, EBV
  • Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

The accurate diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infections is important, as many other infectious agents or diseases can cause similar symptoms. In this study, sera of pediatric patients who were suspected to have an EBV infection, were sent to Eskisehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Microbiology, and investigated by IFA, ELISA, immunoblotting and Real-time PCR. The performances of these tests were compared with IFA. The rates of agreement between ELISA and IFA were found as 100% for seronegative, 100% for acute primary infection, 22.2% for late primary infection, 92.1% for past infection. The rates of agreement between immunoblotting and IFA were found as 80.8% for seronegative, 68.8% for acute primary infection, 55.6% for late primary infection, 86.6% for past infection. The sensitivity of immunoblotting for anti-VCA IgM was identical with ELISA, and higher for anti-VCA IgG, anti-EBNA IgG, anti-EA antibodies, while the specificity of immunoblotting for these antibodies were found to be lower. The sensitivity and specificity of Real-time PCR for detection of viremia in acute primary infection were found as 56.25% (9/16) and 97.89% (139/142), respectively. The diagnostic methods should be chosen by evaluating the demographic characteristics of patients and laboratory conditions together.