Two-body wear of occlusal splint materials


Kurt H., Erdelt K. -., Cilingir A., Mumcu E., Sülün T., Tuncer N., ...Daha Fazla

JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, cilt.39, ss.584-590, 2012 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 39
  • Basım Tarihi: 2012
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02301.x
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.584-590
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: wear, wear resistance, two-body wear, splint materials, splint therapy, IN-VITRO WEAR, RESIN DENTURE TEETH, TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDERS, BITE FORCE, COMPOSITE, DEVICE, RESISTANCE, BRUXISM
  • Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

This study investigates the wear resistance of four different types of occlusal splint materials based on two-body wear simulations under wet and dry conditions. Twenty specimens of each splint material (Dentalon Plus, Orthoplast, Biocryl C, and Eclipse), each with a diameter of 16 mm and a thickness of 3 mm, were tested, half under wet and half under dry conditions. Each wear test was performed using a device called chewing simulator CS-4 (n = 10; test load: 50 N; number of cycles: 10 000, 20 000, and 30 000; continuous rinsing with 30 degrees C water for wet conditions); the antagonists were simulated using steel balls. Wear was determined using a 3D laser scanner and a surface analysis program. To detect significant statistical differences, wear data after 10 000; 20 000; and 30 000 cycles were compared using the KruskalWallis test and the MannWhitney U-test. The level of significance was set at 5%. Significant differences were found between the groups of different materials tested under wet conditions (P < 0.05), whereas no differences between them were found under dry conditions (P > 0.05). No significant difference was found between the wet and dry conditions for all materials and cycles (P > 0.05). For groups of different materials tested under wet conditions, the degree of volume loss generated in the Chewing Simulator CS-4 was found to differ significantly for different numbers of cycles. The presence of water had no effect on the volume loss in the different material groups that were tested.