Preoperative Spinopelvic Alignment in Recurrent versus Nonrecurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Comparative Cohort Study


Creative Commons License

Topcu U., Özbek Z., Özkara E., Arslantaş A.

World Neurosurgery, cilt.210, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 210
  • Basım Tarihi: 2026
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.wneu.2026.124994
  • Dergi Adı: World Neurosurgery
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, EMBASE, Index Islamicus, MEDLINE
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Lumbar lordosis, PI–LL mismatch, Recurrent lumbar disc herniation, Sagittal balance, Spinopelvic alignment
  • Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
  • Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the association between preoperative spinopelvic alignment parameters and recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) and assess their value in potentially predicting recurrence following surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 117 patients who underwent single-level lumbar discectomy between 2015 and 2018 was analyzed. The RLDH group included 62 patients who required reoperation due to recurrence, whereas the control group consisted of 55 patients with at least 24 months of recurrence-free follow-up. Preoperative standing lateral radiographs were used to measure lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and PI–LL mismatch. Intergroup comparisons were performed, followed by univariate logistic regression to identify independent associations. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to evaluate diagnostic performance. Results: The RLDH group showed significantly lower LL (38° vs., 53°, P < 0.001) and greater PI–LL mismatch (9° vs., −3°, P < 0.001) compared with controls. No significant differences were found in PI, pelvic tilt, or sacral slope. Logistic regression identified LL (odds ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.87–0.94; P < 0.001) and PI–LL mismatch (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.05–1.13; P < 0.001) as independently associated with recurrence. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated good predictive ability for LL (area under the curve, 0.815; cutoff ≤49°) and PI–LL mismatch (area under the curve, 0.786; cutoff ≥4°). Conclusions: Reduced LL and increased PI–LL mismatch are independently associated with RLDH and demonstrate potential predictive value for recurrence risk. These findings highlight the importance of sagittal alignment in recurrence risk assessment and support their use in preoperative planning and surgical decision-making.