The effects of traditional grazing practices on Upland (Yayla) rangeland vegetation and forage quality


ÇOMAKLI B., Daşci M., Koç A.

Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, cilt.32, sa.4, ss.259-265, 2008 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 32 Sayı: 4
  • Basım Tarihi: 2008
  • Doi Numarası: 10.3906/tar-0802-26
  • Dergi Adı: Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.259-265
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Botanical composition, Canopy coverage, Upland rangelands
  • Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

A seminomadic animal raising system, known as "yaylacιlιk" in Turkish, is one of the best ways of using upland rangelands, particularly in rough terrain regions. Three rangeland sites were selected to determine the spatial effect of summer grazing distribution on botanical composition, canopy coverage, soil aggregate stability, and forage nutrient content in these range sites. On average, grass covered 61.09% of the total land in site 1, 67.04% and 57.40%, respectively, in sites II and III. Legume covered 11.61%, 13.67%. and 18.05%, respectively, of the total land in sites I, II, and III. Other families covered 27.30%, 19.29%, and 24.55% of each sites, respectively. Sheep fescue (Festuca ovina) was the dominate species in all sites. The canopy coverage was highest (38.63%) in site II, lowest (25.80%) in site III. The range condition score was 39.5, 45.8, and 1.7, respectively in sites I, II and III. The range condition and health class was at risk in site I and II, and unhealthy in site III. Compared to the other sites, soil aggregate stability was higher in site If. Crude protein content was 12.11%, 13.34%, and 12.81; available K content was 2.47%, 2.69%, and 2.12%; Ca content was 0.74%, 0.86%, and 0.76%; Mg content was 2515, 2825 and 2720 ppm; available P content was 1155, 1392, and 1203 ppm, respectively, in sites I, II, and III. Current grazing management practices leads to overgrazing pressure around water resources; therefore, developing new water resources and a suitable grazing management plan are necessary to provide sustainable use of upland rangelands. © TÜBİTAK.