Effects of Salicylic Acid Concentration and Exposure Time on the Surface Fungal Load of Tulip Bulbs

Özer Uyar G. E., Çavuşoğlu A., Ünal F.

Asian Journal of Biology, cilt.20, sa.11, ss.1-10, 2024 (Hakemli Dergi)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 20 Sayı: 11
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.9734/ajob/2024/v20i11444
  • Dergi Adı: Asian Journal of Biology
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Index Copernicus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1-10
  • Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Özer Uyaret al.; Asian J. Biol., vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1-10, 2024; Article no.AJOB.1240432differences in fungal growth inhibition across different SA concentrations and exposuretimes. Results:According to the results, the SFL of tulip bulbs decreased with increasing SA concentrations. Additionally, SA treatment significantly lowered SFL according to the initial log CFU at all exposure times except for one-hour exposure. The EC50 of SA values changed as a function of the exposure times, which ranged from 194 to 23 ppm against the SFL of tulip bulbs. These results suggest that SA may be a promising candidate for the treatment of fungal diseases in tulips.Conclusion:SA demonstrated effective antifungal properties compared to synthetic fungicides, suggesting it could mitigate storage diseases in tulip bulbs. Recommendations included using 1600 ppm SA for six hours or 800 ppm SA for 24 hours to manage fungal contamination before storage or planting of tulip bulbsAims:
Aims: The  purpose  of  this  study  was  to  determine  the  impact  of  various  SA  concentrations  and exposure times on the surface fungal load (SFL) of tulip bulbs.Place  and  Duration  of  Study:Department  of  Plant  Protection,  Kocaeli  University,  in  the  year  of 2022.Methodology:The tulip bulb (Tulipa gesnerianaL. cv. Royal Ten) used in the study was obtained from  an  officially  registered  flower  bulb  company  in  Türkiye.  SA  solutions  ranging  from  0  to  1600 ppm were prepared and used to treat tulip bulbs for 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours. Microbiological analysis involved  assessing  fungal  growth  inhibition  through  colony  counts  on  potato  dextrose  agar  plates after  incubation.  Statistical  analysis,  employing  ANOVA  and  Scheffe  tests,  evaluated  significant differences   in   fungal   growth   inhibition   across   different   SA   concentrations   and   exposuretimes. Results:According   to   the   results,   the   SFL   of   tulip   bulbs   decreased   with   increasing   SA concentrations. Additionally, SA treatment significantly lowered SFL according to the initial log CFU at all exposure times except for one-hour exposure. The EC50 of SA values changed as a function of  the  exposure  times,  which  ranged  from  194  to  23  ppm  against  the  SFL  of  tulip  bulbs.  These results suggest that SA may be a promising candidate for the treatment of fungal diseases in tulips.Conclusion:SA  demonstrated  effective  antifungal  properties  compared  to  synthetic  fungicides, suggesting it could mitigate storage diseases in tulip bulbs. Recommendations included using 1600 ppm SA for six hours or 800 ppm SA for 24 hours to manage fungal contamination before storage or planting of tulip bulbs.Aims: The  purpose  of  this  study  was  to  determine  the  impact  of  various  SA  concentrations  and exposure times on the surface fungal load (SFL) of tulip bulbs.Place  and  Duration  of  Study:Department  of  Plant  Protection,  Kocaeli  University,  in  the  year  of 2022.Methodology:The tulip bulb (Tulipa gesnerianaL. cv. Royal Ten) used in the study was obtained from  an  officially  registered  flower  bulb  company  in  Türkiye.  SA  solutions  ranging  from  0  to  1600 ppm were prepared and used to treat tulip bulbs for 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours. Microbiological analysis involved  assessing  fungal  growth  inhibition  through  colony  counts  on  potato  dextrose  agar  plates after  incubation.  Statistical  analysis,  employing  ANOVA  and  Scheffe  tests,  evaluated  significant differences   in   fungal   growth   inhibition   across   different   SA   concentrations   and   exposuretimes. Results:According   to   the   results,   the   SFL   of   tulip   bulbs   decreased   with   increasing   SA concentrations. Additionally, SA treatment significantly lowered SFL according to the initial log CFU at all exposure times except for one-hour exposure. The EC50 of SA values changed as a function of  the  exposure  times,  which  ranged  from  194  to  23  ppm  against  the  SFL  of  tulip  bulbs.  These results suggest that SA may be a promising candidate for the treatment of fungal diseases in tulips.Conclusion:SA  demonstrated  effective  antifungal  properties  compared  to  synthetic  fungicides, suggesting it could mitigate storage diseases in tulip bulbs. Recommendations included using 1600 ppm SA for six hours or 800 ppm SA for 24 hours to manage fungal contamination before storage or planting of tulip bulbs.The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of various SA concentrations and exposure times on the surface fungal load (SFL) of tulip bulbs.Place and Duration of Study:Department of Plant Protection, Kocaeli University, in the year of 2022.Methodology:The tulip bulb (Tulipa gesnerianaL. cv. Royal Ten) used in the study was obtained from an officially registered flower bulb company in Türkiye. SA solutions ranging from 0 to 1600 ppm were prepared and used to treat tulip bulbs for 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours. Microbiological analysis involved assessing fungal growth inhibition through colony counts on potato dextrose agar plates after incubation. Statistical analysis, employing ANOVA and Scheffe tests, evaluated significant Original Research Article
Aims: The  purpose  of  this  study  was  to  determine  the  impact  of  various  SA  concentrations  and exposure times on the surface fungal load (SFL) of tulip bulbs.Place  and  Duration  of  Study:Department  of  Plant  Protection,  Kocaeli  University,  in  the  year  of 2022.Methodology:The tulip bulb (Tulipa gesnerianaL. cv. Royal Ten) used in the study was obtained from  an  officially  registered  flower  bulb  company  in  Türkiye.  SA  solutions  ranging  from  0  to  1600 ppm were prepared and used to treat tulip bulbs for 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours. Microbiological analysis involved  assessing  fungal  growth  inhibition  through  colony  counts  on  potato  dextrose  agar  plates after  incubation.  Statistical  analysis,  employing  ANOVA  and  Scheffe  tests,  evaluated  significant differences   in   fungal   growth   inhibition   across   different   SA   concentrations   and   exposuretimes. Results:According   to   the   results,   the   SFL   of   tulip   bulbs   decreased   with   increasing   SA concentrations. Additionally, SA treatment significantly lowered SFL according to the initial log CFU at all exposure times except for one-hour exposure. The EC50 of SA values changed as a function of  the  exposure  times,  which  ranged  from  194  to  23  ppm  against  the  SFL  of  tulip  bulbs.  These results suggest that SA may be a promising candidate for the treatment of fungal diseases in tulips.Conclusion:SA  demonstrated  effective  antifungal  properties  compared  to  synthetic  fungicides, suggesting it could mitigate storage diseases in tulip bulbs. Recommendations included using 1600 ppm SA for six hours or 800 ppm SA for 24 hours to manage fungal contamination before storage or planting of tulip bulbs.Aims: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of various SA concentrations and exposure times on the surface fungal load (SFL) of tulip bulbs.Place and Duration of Study:Department of Plant Protection, Kocaeli University, in the year of 2022.Methodology:The tulip bulb (Tulipa gesnerianaL. cv. Royal Ten) used in the study was obtained from an officially registered flower bulb company in Türkiye. SA solutions ranging from 0 to 1600 ppm were prepared and used to treat tulip bulbs for 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours. Microbiological analysis involved assessing fungal growth inhibition through colony counts on potato dextrose agar plates after incubation. Statistical analysis, employing ANOVA and Scheffe tests, evaluated significanAims: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of various SA concentrations and exposure times on the surface fungal load (SFL) of tulip bulbs.Place and Duration of Study:Department of Plant Protection, Kocaeli University, in the year of 2022.Methodology:The tulip bulb (Tulipa gesnerianaL. cv. Royal Ten) used in the study was obtained from an officially registered flower bulb company in Türkiye. SA solutions ranging from 0 to 1600 ppm were prepared and used to treat tulip bulbs for 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours. Microbiological analysis involved assessing fungal growth inhibition through colony counts on potato dextrose agar plates after incubation. Statistical analysis, employing ANOVA and Scheffe tests, evaluated significanAims: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of various SA concentrations and exposure times on the surface fungal load (SFL) of tulip bulbs.Place and Duration of Study:Department of Plant Protection, Kocaeli University, in the year of 2022.Methodology:The tulip bulb (Tulipa gesnerianaL. cv. Royal Ten) used in the study was obtained from an officially registered flower bulb company in Türkiye. SA solutions ranging from 0 to 1600 ppm were prepared and used to treat tulip bulbs for 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours. Microbiological analysis involved assessing fungal growth inhibition through colony counts on potato dextrose agar plates after incubation. Statistical analysis, employing ANOVA and Scheffe tests, evaluated significanAims: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of various SA concentrations and exposure times on the surface fungal load (SFL) of tulip bulbs.Place and Duration of Study:Department of Plant Protection, Kocaeli University, in the year of 2022.Methodology:The tulip bulb (Tulipa gesnerianaL. cv. Royal Ten) used in the study was obtained from an officially registered flower bulb company in Türkiye. SA solutions ranging from 0 to 1600 ppm were prepared and used to treat tulip bulbs for 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours. Microbiological analysis involved assessing fungal growth inhibition through colony counts on potato dextrose agar plates after incubation. Statistical analysis, employing ANOVA and Scheffe tests, evaluated significant Aims: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of various SA concentrations and exposure times on the surface fungal load (SFL) of tulip bulbs.Place and Duration of Study:Department of Plant Protection, Kocaeli University, in the year of 2022.Methodology:The tulip bulb (Tulipa gesnerianaL. cv. Royal Ten) used in the study was obtained from an officially registered flower bulb company in Türkiye. SA solutions ranging from 0 to 1600 ppm were prepared and used to treat tulip bulbs for 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours. Microbiological analysis involved assessing fungal growth inhibition through colony counts on potato dextrose agar plates after incubation. Statistical analysis, employing ANOVA and Scheffe tests, evaluated significant OrigAims: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of various SA concentrations and exposure times on the surface fungal load (SFL) of tulip bulbs.Place and Duration of Study:Department of Plant Protection, Kocaeli University, in the year of 2022.Methodology:The tulip bulb (Tulipa gesnerianaL. cv. Royal Ten) used in the study was obtained from an officially registered flower bulb company in Türkiye. SA solutions ranging from 0 to 1600 ppm were prepared and used to treat tulip bulbs for 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours. Microbiological analysis involved assessing fungal growth inhibition through colony counts on potato dextrose agar plates after incubation. Aims: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of various SA concentrations and exposure times on the surface fungal load (SFL) of tulip bulbs.Place and Duration of Study:Department of Plant Protection, Kocaeli University, in the year of 2022.Methodology:The tulip bulb (Tulipa gesnerianaL. cv. Royal Ten) used in the study was obtained from an officially registered flower bulb company in Türkiye. SA solutions ranging from 0 to 1600 ppm were prepared and used to treat tulip bulbs for 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours. Microbiological analysis involved assessing fungal growth inhibition through colony counts on potato dextrose agar plates after incubation. Aims: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of various SA concentrations and exposure times on the surface fungal load (SFL) of tulip bulbs.Place and Duration of Study:Department of Plant Protection, Kocaeli University, in the year of 2022.Methodology:TAims: The  purpose  of  this  study  was  to  determine  the  impact  of  various  SA  concentrations  and exposure times on the surface fungal load (SFL) of tulip bulbs.Place  and  Duration  of  Study:Department  of  Plant  Protection,  Kocaeli  University,  in  the  year  of 2022.Methodology:The tulip bulb (Tulipa gesnerianaL. cv. Royal Ten) used in the study was obtained from  an  officially  registered  flower  bulb  company  in  Türkiye.  SA  solutions  ranging  from  0  to  1600 ppm were prepared and used to treat tulip bulbs for 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours. Microbiological analysis involved  assessing  fungal  growth  inhibition  through  colony  counts  on  potato  dextrose  agar  plates after  incubation.  Statistical  analysis,  employing  ANOVA  and  Scheffe  tests,  evaluated  significant differences   in   fungal   growth   inhibition   across   different   SA   concentrations   and   exposuretimes. Results:According   to   the   results,   the   SFL   of   tulip   bulbs   decreased   with   increasing   SA concentrations. Additionally, SA treatment significantly lowered SFL according to the initial log CFU at all exposure times except for one-hour exposure. The EC50 of SA values changed as a function of  the  exposure  times,  which  ranged  from  194  to  23  ppm  against  the  SFL  of  tulip  bulbs.  These results suggest that SA may be a promising candidate for the treatment of fungal diseases in tulips.Conclusion:SA  demonstrated  effective  antifungal  properties  compared  to  synthetic  fungicides, suggesting it could mitigate storage diseases in tulip bulbs. Recommendations included using 1600 ppm SA for six hours or 800 ppm SA for 24 hours to manage fungal contamination before storage or planting of tulip bulbs.

he tulip bulb (Tulipa gesnerianaL. cv. Royal Ten) used in the study was obtained from an officially registered flower bulb company in Türkiye. SA solutions ranging from 0 to 1600 ppm were prepared and used to treat tulip bulbs for 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours. Microbiological analysis involved assessing fungal growth inhibition through colony counts on potato dextrose agar plates after incubation. StatisticaAims: The  purpose  of  this  study  was  to  determine  the  impact  of  various  SA  concentrations  and exposure times on the surface fungal load (SFL) of tulip bulbs.Place  and  Duration  of  Study:Department  of  Plant  Protection,  Kocaeli  University,  in  the  year  of 2022.Methodology:The tulip bulb (Tulipa gesnerianaL. cv. Royal Ten) used in the study was obtained from  an  officially  registered  flower  bulb  company  in  Türkiye.  SA  solutions  ranging  from  0  to  1600

Aims: The  purpose  of  this  study  was  to  determine  the  impact  of  various  SA  concentrations  and exposure times on the surface fungal load (SFL) of tulip bulbs.Place  and  Duration  of  Study:Department  of  Plant  Protection,  Kocaeli  University,  in  the  year  of 2022.Methodology:The tulip bulb (Tulipa gesnerianaL. cv. Royal Ten) used in the study was obtained from  an  officially  registered  flower  bulb  company  in  Türkiye.  SA  solutions  ranging  from  0  to  1600 ppm were prepared and used to treat tulip bulbs for 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours. Microbiological analysis involved  assessing  fungal  growth  inhibition  through  colony  counts  on  potato  dextrose  agar  plates after  incubation.  Statistical  analysis,  employing  ANOVA  and  Scheffe  tests,  evaluated  significant differences   in   fungal   growth   inhibition   across   different   SA   concentrations   and   exposuretimes. Results:According   to   the   results,   the   SFL   of   tulip   bulbs   decreased   with   increasing   SA concentrations. Additionally, SA treatment significantly lowered SFL according to the initial log CFU at all exposure times except for one-hour exposure. The EC50 of SA values changed as a function of  the  exposure  times,  which  ranged  from  194  to  23  ppm  against  the  SFL  of  tulip  bulbs.  These results suggest that SA may be a promising candidate for the treatment of fungal diseases in tulips.Conclusion:SA  demonstrated  effective  antifungal  properties  compared  to 

Aims: The  purpose  of  this  study  was  to  determine  the  impact  of  various  SA  concentrations  and exposure times on the surface fungal load (SFL) of tulip bulbs.Place  and  Duration  of  Study:Department  of  Plant  Protection,  Kocaeli  University,  in  the  year  of 2022.Methodology:The tulip bulb (Tulipa gesnerianaL. cv. Royal Ten) used in the study was obtained from  an  officially  registered  flower  bulb  company  in  Türkiye.  SA  solutions  ranging  from  0  to  1600 ppm were prepared and used to treat tulip bulbs for 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours. Microbiological analysis involved  assessing  fungal  growth  inhibition  through  colony  counts  on  potato  dextrose  agar  plates after  incubation.  Statistical  analysis,  employing  ANOVA  and  Scheffe  tests,  evaluated  significant differences   in   fungal   growth   inhibition   across   different   SA   concentrations   and   exposuretimes. Results:According   to   the   results,   the   SFL   of   tulip   bulbs   decreased   with   increasing   SA concentrations. Additionally, SA treatment significantly lowered SFL according to the initial log CFU at all exposure times except for one-hour exposure. The EC50 of SA values changed as a function of  the  exposure  times,  which  ranged  from  194  to  23  ppm  against  the  SFL  of  tulip  bulbs.  These results suggest that SA may be a promising candidate for the treatment of fungal diseases in tulips.Conclusion:SA  demonstrated  effective  antifungal  properties  compared  to  synthetic  fungicides, suggesting it could mitigate storage diseases in tulip bulbs. Recommendations included using 1600 ppm SA for six hours or 800 ppm SA for 24 hours to manage fungal contamination before storage or planting of tulip bulbs.

fungicides, suggesting it could mitigate storage diseases in tulip bulbs. Recommendations included using 1600 ppm SA for six hours or 800 ppm SA for 24 hours to manage fungal contamination before storage or planting of tulip bulbs.

were prepared and used to treat tulip bulbs for 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours. Microbiological analysis involved  assessing  fungal  growth  inhibition  through  colony  counts  on  potato  dextrose  agar  plates after  incubation.  Statistical  analysis,  employing  ANOVA  and  Scheffe  tests,  evaluated  significant differences   in   fungal   growth   inhibition   across   different   SA   concentrations   and   exposuretimes. Results:According   to   the   results,   the   SFL   of   tulip   bulbs   decreased   with   increasing   SA concentrations. Additionally, SA treatment significantly lowered SFL according to the initial log CFU at all exposure times except for one-hour exposure. The EC50 of SA values changed as a function of  the  exposure  times,  which  ranged  from  194  to  23  ppm  against  the  SFL  of  tulip  bulbs.  These results suggest that SA may be a promising candidate for the treatment of fungal diseases in tulips.Conclusion:SA  demonstrated  effective  antifungal  properties  compared  to  synthetic  fungicides, suggesting it could mitigate storage diseases in tulip bulbs. Recommendations included using 1600 ppm SA for six hours or 800 ppm SA for 24 hours to manage fungal contamination before storage or planting of tulip bulbs.

l analysis, employing ANOVA and Scheffe tests, evaluated significanStatistical analysis, employing ANOVA and Scheffe tests, evaluated significant Statistical analysis, employing ANOVA and Scheffe tests, evaluated significant inal Research Article
Özer Uyaret al.; Asian J. Biol., vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1-10, 2024; Article no.AJOB.1240432differences in fungal growth inhibition across different SA concentrations and exposuretimes. Results:According to the results, the SFL of tulip bulbs decreased with increasing SA concentrations. Additionally, SA treatment significantly lowered SFL according to the initial log CFU at all exposure times except for one-hour exposure. The EC50 of SA values changed as a function of the exposure times, which ranged from 194 to 23 ppm against the SFL of tulip bulbs. These results suggest that SA may be a promising candidate for the treatment of fungal diseases in tulips.Conclusion:SA demonstrated effective antifungal properties compared to synthetic fungicides, suggesting it could mitigate storage diseases in tulip bulbs. Recommendations included using 1600 ppm SA for six hours or 800 ppm SA for 24 hours to manage fungal contamination before storage
or planting of tulip bulbsÖzer Uyaret al.; Asian J. Biol., vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1-10, 2024; Article no.AJOB.1240432differences in fungal growth inhibition across different SA concentrations and exposuretimes. Results:According to the results, the SFL of tulip bulbs decreased with increasing SA concentrations. Additionally, SA treatment significantly lowered SFL according to the initial log CFU at all exposure times except for one-hour exposure. The EC50 of SA values changed as a function of the exposure times, which ranged from 194 to 23 ppm against the SFL of tulip bulbs. These results suggest that SA may be a promising candidate for the treatment of fungal diseases in tulips.Conclusion:SA demonstrated effective antifungal properties compared to synthetic fungicides, suggesting it could mitigate storage diseases in tulip bulbs. Recommendations included using 1600 ppm SA for six hours or 800 ppm SA for 24 hours to manage fungal contamination before storage or planting of tulip bulbs