EXPLORING THE GENDER GAP AT THE 57TH NATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION OF TURKEY: A RETROSPECTIVE INVESTIGATION OF FEMALE REPRESENTATION


Creative Commons License

Özel B., Sürme Kılıç İ., Türkmen Mercan S., Yılmaz Karaman İ. G.

1. Uluslararası 25. Ulusal Klinik Eğitim Sempozyumu, İzmir, Türkiye, 19 - 22 Mayıs 2022, ss.82

  • Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Özet Bildiri
  • Basıldığı Şehir: İzmir
  • Basıldığı Ülke: Türkiye
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.82
  • Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Although the proportion of women in

science has substantially increased over the last century, women remain

underrepresented in academia, especially at senior levels. In addition,

their scientific achievements do not always receive the same level of

recognition as do men's, which can be reflected in a lower relative

representation of women among invited speakers at conferences or

specialized courses. Our goal was to describe the proportion of female

representation among speakers and moderators at the 57. National

Congress of the Psychiatric Association of Turkey (57NC-PAT).

METHODS: The public conference program of the 57NC-PAT was

obtained online. Three independent researchers coded sessions and

presentations. The concordance between coders was 100%. No ethics

approval was needed since we used publicly available data. Since the

data were not normally distributed, we present our results as median

and quartiles.

RESULTS: We retrospectively evaluated a total of 19 courses, 61

panels, 14 conferences, 29 other sessions, 77 poster presentations, 33

oral presentations, eight oral presentations as nominees for the award.

Females presented as following mean percentages: 50 (0-100) for

courses, 60 (0-67) for panels, 0 (0-100) for conferences, 50 (33-71)

for other sessions, 50 (38-100) for poster presentations, 50 (33-90) for

oral presentations, 100 (100-100) for oral presentations as nominees

for the award. According to data, women were equally represented

among sessions. Sessions that had "only male" or "only female" speakers

compared: panels (29.5% vs. 14.8%), courses (36.8% vs. 26.3%),

conferences (57.1% vs. 28.6%) had higher percentages of only male

versus only female teams. On the other hand, poster presentations

(11.7% vs. 31.2%), oral presentations (6.1% vs. 24.2%), and oral

presentations as nominees for the award (12.5% vs. 87.5%) had "only

female" teams more frequently than "only male" teams. There were 18

foreign speakers at the congress; only 22% were women.

CONCLUSIONS: Compared to male scientists in the scientific

community, the lower visibility of female scientists stems partly from

presenting research as an invited speaker at organized meetings.

Although the gender gap among speakers at the 57NC-PAT was narrow,

we must remain cognizant of its presence, especially regarding highranked positions, including moderators of sessions. Therefore, we must

continue to work towards equal representation.

Simple rules may be followed to achieve gender balance for future

meetings. Although individual contributions such as mentoring,

sponsorship, or speaking up about inequity are invaluable, a significant

change likely requires organizational initiatives. Furthermore, a potential

starting point might be gender parity on program committees.