The Role of Agarose Gel Immunofixation Electrophoresis as a Reflex Test to Capillary Electrophoresis Immunotyping


Creative Commons License

Aburas Z. A., Işıklar Ö. Ö., Kocatürk E.

XXXIII. WASPaLM World Congress & XXIV. National Clinicial Biochemistry Congress 16-20 October 2024, Granada Congress Center Belek-Antalya/Türkiye, Antalya, Türkiye, 16 - 20 Ekim 2024, ss.49

  • Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Özet Bildiri
  • Basıldığı Şehir: Antalya
  • Basıldığı Ülke: Türkiye
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.49
  • Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Introduction: Protein electrophoresis is a laboratory method used to separate protein molecules based

on their size and electrical charge. Agarose gel or capillary zone electrophoresis are main techniques

used to identify monoclonal gammopathies and detect serum protein disorders. Capillary

electrophoresis immunotyping (IT) and gel Immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) are used to confirm

the presence of M-protein and to determine its subtype. Although IFE is a gold standard technique,

capillary electrophoresis IT test is easier to perform and less time-consuming. The aim of this study

was to detect the number of IT results which was later referred to be analyzed in gel IFE. Moreover, to

analyze the importance of this referral to the final report of the result.

Method: In this retrospective study, the results of patients who applied to our hospital between March

2023 and February 2024 for IT were evaluated. According to the IT assessment by at least 4 clinical

biochemistry specialist/residency student, results which required further evaluation by gel IFE to be

reported, were classified into two groups. Group I for patients’ results included suspicion of

monoclonal gammopathy. According to their suspicion, sub-groups were categorized as; (Ia) samples

with hypogammaglobulinemia, (Ib) samples that were thought that they are uncertain/difficult to

evaluate by only one specialist and (Ic) by two or more specialists. Group II for samples with

gammopathy that couldn’t be subtyped by IT technique. Sub-groups were categorized as; (IIa) samples

with the suspicion of biclonality, (IIb) samples need to be analyzed to detect whether IG D or IG E

monoclonal gammopathy is present or not and (IIc) samples which require processing with

mercaptoethanol for certainty of biclonality.

Results: In total 1056 IT results were analyzed, 46.7% of the results required gel IFE. According to

the IFE results: Monoclonal gammopathy was detected in 49.6% of group I, the results were

distributed as: 54.1% in (Ia), 40.4% in (Ib) and 53.9% in (Ic), to subgroups. Biclonal gammopathy was

detected in 59.6% of group (IIa), IG D monoclonal gammopathy was detected in 20% of group (IIb)

and dimeric gammopathy was detected in 37.5% of group (IIc).

Conclusion: It’s important to note that, evaluating IT combination with gel IFE is fundamental to

detect all challenging gammopathies. In addition, it’s beneficial to work as a team with multiple

experienced specialists to distinguish minimal gammopathies within IT evaluation.

Keywords: Blood protein electrophoresis, capillary electrophoresis, immunoelectrophoresis,

monoclonal gammopathies