The Impact of Cytogenetic Aberrations in the Clonal Evolution of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Single-Center Experience Among 450 Turkish Patients (Cohort Study)

Creative Commons License

Işık S., Günden G., Üsküdar Teke H., Akay O. M., Oğuz Davutoğlu N., Aslan V., ...Daha Fazla

TURKISH JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, cilt.39, sa.4, ss.237-244, 2022 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 39 Sayı: 4
  • Basım Tarihi: 2022
  • Doi Numarası: 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2022.2022.0045
  • Dergi Adı: TURKISH JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.237-244
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Chronic myeloid leukemia, Cytogenetics, Clonal evolution, Prognostic aberrations, Philadelphia chromosome, ADDITIONAL CHROMOSOMAL-ABNORMALITIES, CHRONIC MYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA, NEGATIVE HEMATOPOIESIS, IMATINIB, DIAGNOSIS, RISK, ERA, TRISOMY-8, THERAPY
  • Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a clonal hematologic disorder characterized by t(9;22) translocation, in which cytogenetic aberrations can occur in Ph(+) and (-) clones. These aberrations develop due to clonal evolution as well as treatment and they have prognostic significance. They are grouped as major and minor route anomalies in terms of their effects on prognostic parameters, such as treatment response, overall survival (OS), disease stage, complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), and major molecular response (MMR). It is stated that major route anomalies have unfavorable prognostic effects compared to minor route anomalies. We aimed to investigate the frequency and prognostic effects of cytogenetic anomalies detected in Ph(+) and (-) clones.Materials and Methods: In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the cytogenetic results of 450 patients diagnosed with CML between 2005 and 2020.Results: We detected cytogenetic aberrations in Ph-positive and negative clones in 41 of 450 patients. The most common anomalies were trisomy 8 (+8), additional Ph chromosome (+Ph), and loss of chromosome Y. Rarely, aneuploidy of the Y chromosome, dup (22), +11, and +6 were seen in CML patients. We observed that these identified aberrations negatively affected MMR and CCyR, and generally resulted in changing imatinib treatment for second-generation tyrosine kinase activity inhibitors. Our results are compatible with the literature.Conclusion: We suggest that cytogenetic aberrations detected in Ph(+) and (-) clones should be a warning sign in terms of treatment and require close observation. The use of cytogenetic methods for the identification of these anomalies is also important.